The fireplace left one employee with burns to an arm and hand.
A route is extra critical than a discover. This comes after a collection of instructions issued for the state of a few of its platforms, which the regulator requires it to decommission inside seven years.
The platforms are a part of the broader historic Gippsland Basin Joint Enterprise operator Exxon shares with BHP. Woodside will take over when its acquistion of the latter’s patroleum completes subsequent yr, topic to shareholder approval.
Kingfish B was shutin three years in the past and Exxon begund decom work early this yr. The platform was briefly house to a misplaced flying fox some years in the past, which staff apparently fed with fruit till he may very well be moved onshore.
Workers of contractor UGL had been eradicating the closed pile pump string from the cassion when the vapour inside ignited, inflicting a three-second flash hearth.
The Nationwide Offshore Petroleum Security and Environmental Administration Authority mentioned the flash hearth got here after containment was damaged on a closed drain skimmer pile, which was opened to switch the pile pump.
It mentioned throughout its investigation there have been “plenty of failures” by Exxon to take fairly sensible steps to deal with the protection points that prompted the hearth.
Employees didn’t carry up recognized issues of safety, fearing they may lose their jobs, NOPSEMA’s investigation discovered.
Exxon and UGL performed an investigation and located there have been assorted points which included work supervision, consciousness and implementation of administration methods,
and a “lack of reference to the prevailing security case controls” that associated to fireplace or explosions.
The corporate has instructed NOPSEMA additionally it is conducting a “Chilly Eyes Security Management Overview… “to evaluate the offshore security tradition”.
An Exxon spokesperson instructed Power Information it took security critically and paused work after what it described as a “small hearth”.
“For the reason that incident, we now have labored exhausting to include learnings and deal with any considerations the regulator or our staff could have, and Esso has already taken corrective actions, together with gear upgrades, enhancement of coaching procedures and elevated interface with contract companions,” the spokesperson instructed Power Information.
“We actively encourage our workforce to report any security considerations with out concern of retribution, so we will determine and forestall incidents earlier than they happen and apply these learnings throughout all of our operations to make sure a secure office for all.”
NOPSEMA is just not glad with this and has demanded it start a third-party exterior overview and supply all findings inside 270 days given it has conclusively discovered a “collection of failures” led to the hearth, exacerbated by a workforce scared to air their considerations. A separate, impartial overview have to be undertaken to deal with workforce considerations.
The protection regulator can be involved extra broadly on procedures for altering the equipment, saying it’s “generic in nature” and doesn’t deal with the particular approach it must be carried out on the Kingfish B platform.
It should now design works particular to platforms in all 13 blocks earlier than breaking containment to work on one other pile.
These three necessities make up the content material of the instructions.
The Australian Employees Union and UGL couldn’t be reached for remark.
In a case not dissimilar, the regulator was investigating two incidents at Jadestone Power’s Montara platform offshore Western Australia early final month, certainly one of which additionally resulted in a employee sustaining burns.
Jadestone was later issued a discover after a employee was medevaced from the platform with a rolled ankle. On the time unions alleged a poor security tradition which ignored employee considerations was chargeable for the previous incident.
The burned employee declined to go public for concern of potential retribution, unions mentioned, however he’s understood to be pursuing staff’ compensation.
In keeping with the union group the marine engineer was burned by a boiler when he was working alone, after reportedly suggesting it was unsafe to take action. Jadestone didn’t notify NOPSEMA because it mentioned it was not required to given the burned employee was not helicoptered from the platform.
Jadestone didn’t obtain a discover for the incident however NOPSEMA did publish a be aware on its web site, which didn’t identify the corporate, which mentioned it anticipated to be notified of accidents.